
Exporting Indian tea to the US, UK, or the Gulf means your packaging has to satisfy the destination country’s food-contact law, not India’s alone. Each market runs a different regime: the United States clears packaging substances through the FDA, the United Kingdom applies retained EU food-contact rules, and the GCC works to Gulf Standardization Organization (GSO) standards. The material stays broadly similar; the paperwork that proves it is safe changes at every border.
That paperwork is where shipments actually stall. A metallised paper or foil laminate that passes an FSSAI audit in Kolkata can still be held at a US or Saudi port because the importer cannot produce the right Declaration of Compliance or migration data in the format that market expects. Getting the packaging spec right is only half the job. Getting the compliance file right is the other half, and it is the half most Indian tea exporters under-prepare.
India shipped a record 280.40 million kg of tea in 2025, worth ₹8,488.43 crore, according to the Tea Board of India. The UAE (50.71 million kg), the US (15.21 million kg), and the UK sit among the top destinations. For a packaging manager at an exporting tea brand, that volume rides on getting three distinct compliance regimes right. This guide breaks down what each of them asks of your packaging, and what documents need to travel with the goods.
Every export market asks the same underlying question in its own legal language: can you prove the packaging will not transfer harmful substances into the tea? The answer is a documented one. You need a positive material specification, migration or extractives test data against the destination’s limits, and a signed Declaration of Compliance (DoC) that references the correct legal instrument for that market.
A Declaration of Compliance is a supplier’s formal statement that a food-contact material meets the applicable regulation, backed by supporting test evidence held on file. It is the single document customs officers and importers ask for first. Indian FSSAI compliance does not substitute for it, because FSSAI rules govern the Indian market, and the US, UK, and GCC each require their own attestation.
Three practical points hold across all three markets. First, responsibility for the filing sits with the brand placing the product on the market, not the material supplier alone, though the supplier must furnish the underlying data. Second, the food-contact assessment covers the whole structure, not just the base paper: inks, adhesives, coatings, and any metallised layer are all in scope. Third, each market wants its own legal reference cited on the DoC, even when the technical requirement is nearly identical. If you already sell into Europe, the EU Regulation 1935/2004 requirements for tea packaging are the closest reference point for the UK and GCC frameworks below.

The US clears food-contact materials as indirect food additives, and every substance in your packaging must have an FDA clearance for its intended use. There is no single “FDA approved” stamp for a finished pouch; instead, each component of the structure must trace to a permitted pathway. This is the biggest conceptual shift for exporters used to a single national standard.
Paper and paperboard in contact with tea are governed specifically by 21 CFR 176.170, which covers components of paper and paperboard in contact with aqueous and fatty foods, and the material must meet the extractives limits set there. All food-contact components must also comply with the FDA’s good manufacturing practice rule at 21 CFR 174.5, according to the US Food and Drug Administration.
A given substance in the packaging must qualify under one of four routes: it is listed in 21 CFR as a permitted indirect additive, it is Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) for the use, it holds a Threshold of Regulation exemption, or it is covered by an effective Food Contact Substance Notification (FCN) from the supplier. Your US importer will expect a supplier statement mapping each material to its route. Two operational requirements sit alongside the material rules: your facility needs a US importer operating under the Foreign Supplier Verification Program, and prior notice of the shipment must reach the FDA before arrival. Neither is a packaging question, but both stop tea at the border when missing.
The UK retained the EU food-contact framework almost verbatim, so the technical requirements mirror Europe, but you must cite UK law on your documentation. The Materials and Articles in Contact with Food (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 carried the EU rules into UK domestic law and moved the regulator’s role to UK authorities, overseen by the Food Standards Agency.
In practice, two retained instruments matter for tea packaging: Regulation (EC) 1935/2004, the framework regulation setting the general safety and inertness principle, and Regulation (EC) 2023/2006 on good manufacturing practice, both now enforced as UK retained law per legislation.gov.uk. Your Declaration of Compliance must reference the UK versions of these instruments, not the EU originals, even though the wording is near-identical.
The trap for exporters is assuming European compliance transfers automatically. It does not. A pouch documented against EU regulations still needs its DoC re-cited to UK retained law, and the importer of record in Great Britain carries the compliance obligation. For plastics or metallised layers within the structure, the retained UK equivalent of the EU plastics regulation applies, including its overall migration limit of 10 mg/dm² of food-contact surface. Premium orthodox lines heading to British buyers, such as second flush Darjeeling destined for premium positioning, face the same documentation bar as commodity CTC, so the compliance file cannot be an afterthought on high-value SKUs.

The GCC works to GSO standards, and while these are technically voluntary until each member state adopts them into national law, the major importing states enforce them at the border. For tea packaging, the relevant framework is GSO 2231/2012 on general requirements for materials in contact with food, supported by GSO 839 (food packages, general requirements) and GSO 1863 (plastic packages).
GSO 1863 for plastic and flexible packaging largely mirrors EU Regulation 10/2011, adopting its first several hundred authorised substances, according to the GCC Standardization Organization. That alignment is useful: if your structure is documented for the EU or UK, the technical gap to GCC compliance is usually small. The administrative gap is larger. Saudi Arabia routes imports through its SABER conformity platform under SASO, and the UAE enforces through its national standards body, so a valid conformity certificate matters as much as the material spec.
Two GCC-specific packaging points catch tea exporters. First, labelling must include Arabic alongside English, with production and expiry dates in the format the market specifies, and this often drives artwork changes rather than material changes. Second, halal considerations can extend to processing aids and certain coatings, so confirm your material’s status with the importer early. The UAE alone took 50.71 million kg of Indian tea in 2025 per the Tea Board of India, so the Gulf is not a market to treat as an afterthought.
The three regimes agree on the principle of inertness and disagree on the paperwork. The table below sets out where a tea packaging manager’s effort actually goes in each market. Use it to scope the compliance file before committing artwork and material.
| Criterion | United States (FDA) | United Kingdom | GCC (Gulf) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Governing instrument | 21 CFR 174 to 189 (indirect food additives) | Retained EU 1935/2004 + 2023/2006 (via 2019 EU Exit Regs) | GSO 2231/2012, GSO 839, GSO 1863 |
| Approach | Substance-by-substance clearance (listed / GRAS / TOR / FCN) | Framework + GMP, positive list for plastics | Framework + GSO standards, plastics mirror EU 10/2011 |
| Migration / testing basis | Extractives limits (e.g. 21 CFR 176.170) | Overall migration limit 10 mg/dm² for plastics | Aligned to EU-style migration limits |
| Declaration of Compliance | Supplier statement per component route | DoC citing UK retained law | Conformity certificate (SABER/SASO, ESMA) |
| Labelling driver | English, US nutrition/format rules | English, UK format | Arabic + English, halal considerations |
| Border-stop risk | Missing FSVP / prior notice | DoC still citing EU, not UK, law | No valid conformity certificate |
The pattern is clear: the material science is portable across all three, but the compliance documentation is not. A single well-characterised structure can serve every market, provided you generate three correctly-referenced document sets rather than assuming one covers all. This is the same logic that governs what tea packaging actually costs in India, where documentation and testing are real line items, not free extras.

Every export tea consignment should carry a complete compliance file, and missing paperwork is the most common cause of held shipments. Assemble these before the container ships, not after it is stopped:
Terms such as migration testing, overall migration limit, and Declaration of Compliance recur across all three regimes; the tea packaging glossary defines each if a term is unfamiliar to your team. Building this file once per structure, then re-citing the legal references per market, is far cheaper than reworking artwork and re-testing under deadline pressure. It also sits alongside your domestic obligations, including EPR filing for tea packaging in India, which the export file does not replace.
Before the benefits, the honest limitations. A compliant material does not remove your legal obligation to hold a market-specific Declaration of Compliance and migration data; the filing still sits with the brand placing the tea on the market. A metallised paper structure is exactly that, metallised, so it does not give you a mono-material paper claim, and Pakka does not currently list a non-metallised structure for tea. And because flexC is supplied as reel or laminate stock specified by GSM, your line or your converter runs the material; it is not a finished pouch delivered ready to fill.
With those stated, this is where a paper-based metallised structure earns its place in an export programme. Pakka’s flexC Bleached Teabag Metalized (60 GSM) is a compostable, paper-based, heat-sealable structure with published barrier data: a water vapour transmission rate below 2 g/m²/day measured to ASTM F1249, with GSM and thickness stated to TAPPI T410 and T411. That test-method-cited data is precisely the evidence an importer’s Declaration of Compliance needs, which is the practical advantage over a spec sheet that quotes numbers without a method. It runs on digital, flexographic, and gravure lines, so it fits existing conversion.
For an exporter, the compostable paper base also addresses the recyclability and EPR pressure that aluminium foil laminates carry in several destination markets, without the documentation gaps that come from an under-characterised material. The barrier ceiling still favours foil at the extreme long-shelf-life end, so for teas needing 24 months in high-humidity transit, weigh the trade-off honestly. For most export CTC and orthodox lines on a 9 to 12 month cycle, a documented metallised paper structure meets the barrier need and travels with a cleaner compliance and sustainability story.
Last reviewed: August 2026
No. FSSAI rules govern packaging for the Indian market. Exports to the US, UK, and GCC each require compliance with that market’s own food-contact law and a Declaration of Compliance citing the correct legal instrument. Treat the export compliance file as separate from your domestic FSSAI documentation.
A Declaration of Compliance is a signed supplier statement confirming that a food-contact material meets the applicable regulation for a specific market, supported by migration or extractives test data held on file. It is the first document importers and customs officers request, and it must reference the destination market’s law, not India’s.
Usually yes for the material, provided the structure is well-characterised, but each market needs its own documentation set and often its own labelling. A single metallised paper or foil structure can serve all three, but you must generate a US-referenced, a UK-referenced, and a GCC-referenced compliance file, and adjust artwork for Arabic labelling in the Gulf.
US importers expect extractives data against 21 CFR 176.170 for paper components, plus supplier statements mapping every substance in the structure to its clearance route (listed indirect additive, GRAS, Threshold of Regulation exemption, or a Food Contact Substance Notification). Good manufacturing practice under 21 CFR 174.5 must also be documented.
Technically yes, but the citation changes. The UK retained EU food-contact rules through the Materials and Articles in Contact with Food (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019, so Regulations 1935/2004 and 2023/2006 still apply, now as UK retained law. Your Declaration of Compliance must reference the UK versions, and EU compliance does not transfer automatically.
Exporting Indian tea rewards the brands that treat packaging compliance as a document discipline, not a last-minute scramble at the port. If you are evaluating a paper-based structure that ships with test-method-cited barrier data suited to export documentation, review Pakka’s flexC food packaging range to see where it fits your destination markets. For a structure-specific conversation about your export lines, get in touch with the Pakka team.
Browse all Pakka articles.